But now your teacher wants you to write an exemplification essay, and you feel a little lost. When you first heard the term exemplification essay , you might have freaked out a little bit. An exemplification essay is like a more involved version of an argumentative essay. Facts and numbers will get you far, yes. But you have to effectively incorporate them into your writing. Be sure to ask your teacher about what style guide APA , MLA , or Chicago to follow. Because exemplification essays are like argumentative essays, you want to pick topics that are similar to argumentative topics. If you try to persuade the reader of your position with ambiguous reasoning, guess what? Should drugs be decriminalized? Are classes separated by gender more conducive to learning? Should healthcare be free for everyone? Are gun regulations strict enough? Each of these topics has research supporting the opposing viewpoints. This makes it easier to defend your own position. You just have to defend your argument well. It cannot be backed up with facts or figures. Explain the process of making maple syrup. This would make for a great process essay. But it cannot possibly be an exemplification essay. Now you know what an exemplification essay is. Instead, a little bit of planning will make your exemplification essay easier and faster to write. Below are the four steps to writing an exemplary exemplification essay. As an example, my topic is Who is the best X-Men character? You want to get all of your ideas down on paper first. Click To Tweet Your outline should include a section for the introduction and conclusion. These can include as little or as much information as you want. The most important part of your outline is the body section. My outline is a little short. Your introduction will have two main parts: the hook and the thesis statement. The hook is exactly what it sounds like. The thesis statement explains what your exemplification essay will be about. It presents a brief description of the main points of your body paragraphs. One man, Professor Xavier, stands above all other mutants. He is a shining example of what they can accomplish and who they can become. Professor X uses his one power to mimic various other powers, and he serves as a leader in promoting friendly relationships between mutants and humans. Now that you have your introduction down, you can move to the body paragraphs. This is where making an outline first really comes in handy. You can just fill in the blanks, so to speak. Through his work with mutant children and team of heroes, Professor Xavier has taken great strides in improving the relationships between mutants and humans. His School for Gifted Youngsters helps mutant children and teens learn how to control their powers and use them to benefit others. It also keeps them separated from humans during their teenage years when hormones can have unpredictable consequences. The last thing you have to do is write your conclusion. This involves a summary of your main points. Instead, include some more information that you wrote about in your body paragraphs. After the brief summary, you want to finish nicely. Although many people may fear the powers of mutants, they can actually benefit both humans and other mutants. Professor Xavier has proven this by becoming exceptionally skilled at telepathy. He uses both his powers and his influence to promote better relationships between human and mutant communities. He and his band of heroes fight daily, not only against evildoers, but also against the prejudices aimed at his people. They can give you the feedback you need to make your essay shine. Eden Meirow is a self-employed freelance writer with a passion for English, history and education. How to Write an Exemplary Exemplification Essay. The Exemplification Essay Explained. Excellent and Not So Excellent Exemplification Essay Topics. This topic is very obviously one-sided. Then put them in order.
How To Write An Essay About Myself Online Essay About Nuclear Energy Online College Essay On Diversity Tips
clinical psychology dissertation ideas should abortion be allowed essay writing steps of an essay school The first is how many aspects of our democratic nation resemble his dystopian nightmare. Orwell himself was a socialist, who fought for the republicans in the Spanish Civil War and was wounded by a sniper bullet to the throat. As the West became aware of the horrors of Stalin, Orwell became disillusioned. The Party, whose head is reverently called Big Brother, presides over existence through omnipresent surveillance and mind control. What he finds is pain. In some cases, what is happening in the U. The war, however, is a fabrication accepted and treated as fact. For, unreal as it is, it is not meaningless. World powers become enemies and allies interchangeably simply to keep the masses in perpetual fear, perpetual industry, and perpetual order. War provides outlet for unwanted emotions such as hate, patriotism, and discontent, keeping the structure of society intact and productive without raising the standard of living. In the wake of the sequestration military-spending cuts, it is also manifest that, to many, war means little more than a job. By submitting entirely to the Party, people surrender their identity and the impulses that arise from having one, passively receiving everything. The principles of un freedom and inequality are consciously perpetuated to stifle revolution and uprising, uniting all in a trance under the watchful eye of Big Brother. True freedom is the unimpeded capacity to realize the human good. Freedom in America is generally defined as mere license, which enslaves when human inclinations stray from the good. This American fallacy defines liberty as getting what is wanted, and moreover, that the government is there to give it. Subservience through mindless entitlement for government handouts and bailouts is not freedom, but slavery. Any transgression against the Party is a capital crime. The common habit, therefore, is invincible ignorance: the appearance of orthodoxy without knowing what orthodoxy entails. Has anyone read the Affordable Care Act? The plan appears to be to swallow it in blind lip-service to the ideologies of big government. This mentality is rendered common by a declining—if not fallen—education system. Who can afford college anyway these days? Rather than address the plague of ignorance, America seems more concerned with protecting the ignorant from profiling and unequal opportunity. They are the sleepless eyes monitoring every move, every word, every facial expression, and every involuntary reaction of every person in the effort to detect thoughtcrime. Our telephone calls and browsing histories are accessible to apparently any NSA analyst, according to Mr. Our social security numbers and zip codes are increasingly part of everyday transactions. Private lives are spied upon. We, too, are being watched. National Intelligence Director James Clapper, for instance, was asked at a Senate hearing last March whether the NSA collected information on millions of Americans. From conflicting Benghazi reports to misleading Trayvon photographs, the media regularly and unabashedly fabricates, falsifies, and manipulates according to the agenda du jour. Orwell draws a connection between the success of the tyrannical government and the deterioration of language, as newspeak renders certain ideas literally unthinkable through reduction of vocabulary and grammar. Language control results in thought control. Technological autocorrect and autocomplete functions often dictate our phraseology. Emails and tweets promote stilted communication. And let us not forget text talk, which AFAICT, is not helping anything. As a language deteriorates, the grand and noble ideas it is capable of expressing are in danger of deteriorating also. The fears and confusions of a rapidly changing culture and its permeating devices are disorienting and discouraging. Affairs may not be as grisly as they were for Winston Smith, but we may not be far off. After all, can facecrime really be much different than hate-crime? Is it better for sex to be reduced to its practical purpose or its pleasure? Our only true life is in the future. We shall take part in it as handfuls of dust and splinters of bone. But how far away that future may be, there is no knowing. It might be a thousand years. At present nothing is possible except to extend the area of sanity little by little. He lives in Scranton, PA with his wife and family of four. Although the Government in its present incarnation tells women and gays that sex is all important to get their votes, the real government agenda is to make sex unimportant. The only time sex is important is if a victim group is looking on sexual difference as the basis for a claim against a private entity states always protect themselves. How should the Heterosexual Male respond to this? The Viet Nam Generation which is now in power has always been in favor of declaring victory and going home most recent examples Iraq and Afghanistan , so if the glass ceiling is coopted instead of destroyed, we still all win since we are all women. Other than that, the topics touched upon in your posting are so wide and multifaceted that I would probably have to spend the next week trying to comment upon them. You say that the government is attempting to make sex unimportant, I say they are attempting to make us obsessed with the carnal, at least in the short run. I think that the state is fascinated by sexuality since it is a locus of control. There are those who fit the norm and those that do not. The application of population distinctions includes questions of sex. The distinctions, while often arbitrary, cannot be simply erased. Republican or Democrat or whatever, this was coming no matter what and its scary as shit. No wonder people say America is fucked. Yes please stay in the UK and pay your existence tax, tv taxes and all other ridiculous taxes. Do I want universal health care for USA citizens, of course. Do I want it shoved down my throat, like it is now, fuck no. The system that is proposed here has NO BENEFITS. I cannot find a health care plan that is valid in every county in my state, much less every state in the union. This is big government offering a trapped consumer base to the titans of the insurance industry. They are the ones who created the mess, now they get compulsory participation as a reward. Now of course the issue is moot. Political understanding is usually not the gift of the young, as you may remember from your reading of Plato and Aristotle which I assume you read at Thomas Aquinas. Political analysis is also quite different from the teaching of mythology and poetry. In my opinion, it is difficult to understand what it means to wage war against an idea or a state of being. Such rhetoric puts me on my guard. With no clear idea of the goal, it is difficult to stand behind it. Clarity is always preferable to obscurity. Now, you are quite right in questioning my abilities as a political analyst because I am not a political analyst. I am simply someone who tries to be attentive to what is going on around me, and to make judgments about them in light of what I have learned and what I believe. If my statements are simplistic that is partially due to my intentionally painting with a broad brush in consideration of the medium, and partially to my own view of things, which is broad. Again, I am not a political analyst, but a political observer. The final comment I made concerning the sequestration is a reference to the uproar over furloughs caused by the military budget cuts. There were many people with domestic military jobs who were upset about the spending cuts because they lost their wages which, of course, is unfortunate and regrettable rather than upset because of an ideological or national motivation. The war is so far away to so many both physically and psychologically it is difficult to comprehend the import or purpose of it, which can breed—again, in my opinion—a strange cultural attitude about it. If my observations are glib, I can only say they are not meant to be. They are honest, and, if off target, I am open to the truth in these matters. You know Sean as a resident of Scranton, PA, you could easily see Newspeak in action. Thank you for responding with such good will. I think that shows that you have promise. A good will is more important than a good intellect, and without it a good intellect usually goes astray. Just be careful in offering summations of the state of society or political affairs, especially as you look so young from your picture. In my day, our orders were to destroy the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and take and control the Soviet landmass sufficiently to eliminate any possibility of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union mounting a counteroffensive. We had specific people to kill and specific sites to conquer. Do they wear uniforms or fly flags? Do they have military bases and political parties that can be seized? The truth is endless war for endless profits for the Military-Industrial Complex Eisenhower warned us about. The Patriot Act and its accompanying laws are not to protect us, they are to enable the Party to subjugate us for the above endless profits for the Party. Do I speak the truth? I have some background in military matters as well, and have studied military science for a number of years. I have also spoken to many troops of various rank who have returned from Iraq and Afghanistan. The standards are still high and they are sometimes hard to meet. Then again, perhaps the commanding officer is preparing to host drag queens as one AFB recently did. As an Army Vietnam vet, we had the same problem because the North Vietnamese rarely came out to fight and we never took it to them ground forces, that is. This left the Viet Cong — truly the terrorists of South VIetnam no flags, uniforms, etc and brutal in their methods. I think of these heroes when I visit our United States Veterans Cemetery at Pinelawn, Long Island. While I walk toward the graves of my family, I must walk past those who have died so recently in Iraq and Afghanistan…so many, so young, so tragic. Two years ago, I observed a young woman lying fully prostrate on a grave as if trying to communicate with her lost love…such sorrow. I think it is an important distinction that Orwell fought in an anarchist unit and that he was later almost captured and killed by the socialists. This is an oversimplified, slippery-slope kind of an article. And you support Rubio, Cristie and the like? Once again, I think you are taking it too far and only see it as a left-wing problem. There is at least a fight on the right, on the left there is absolute intellectual homogeneity. Smith congratulations on your cyberspace gender reassignment. Much of what you describe has been going on over several years, presidential administrations, bodies of congress and so on. Who is the Svengali in this puppet show of yours? Plus, now your mixing and matching political satirist writers to bolster your strange, biggoted and paranoid argument. Who is your dumb beast? Can you be specific? Do you have an answer or are you going to continue to quote from old Kung Fu episodes in hopes of passing yourself off as a deep thinker? Or did it all start with Obama? Given that you seem to nothing to offer but a reflexive defense of the state, you are the bigot in the true meaning of the word. Too a lesser mind, gravity acting on a body in space might seem like a conspiracy, rather than the natural result of a massive body deforming space and time. I work in the beast, I understand it. Of course I can tell you are intimately familiar with vast voids. Conspiracy… utter intellectual and moral disorder has, indeed, broken loose! How could I have missed your true meaning so entirely? I just get tired of all the carnival barking… from both sides of the aisle. Why does everything you say sound like a fortune cookie? Enough with the semantic evasions. I realized as an undergraduate economics major, but especially as a bureaucrat that most people especially the ruling class is largely innumerate and they use creative anguage as a weapon. I rather enjoy going into a meeting and meeting some lawyer with logorrhea word for word, it renders the apoplectic. I liked the flowing dexterity of the prolific nature of your word usage….. I laughed as I read it. I was also partly responsible for President Reagan being voted into office. He was the first President I ever voted for and I never regretted it. What an amazing and inspiring leader! Nancy was a lovely and protective wife and First Lady. May his soul rest in peace, and may perpetual Light shine upon him. We could also throw in C. A giant pseudo-scientific corporation called the National Institute for Coordinated Experiments, or NICE, takes over a small college town, and plans to move on from there to the rest of England and then the rest of the world. One of the main protagonists is involved with the institute. Just who or what really controls everything he never discovers. Even though I already know what happens, the stories are all fresh, exciting, impossible to put down, thought-provoking, and profound every single time. The groundwork for the present situation was laid a century ago, when the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Amendments were passed. The Sixteenth Amendment, of course, allowed the federal government to tax income. It also removed important controls on the form and amount of taxation. The first control was that was lost when the individual states were no longer in between the individual and the federal government. Individuals are all to easily divided, distracted and exhausted in dealing with the federal government. The income tax was enacted as easily born instrument of sufficient revenue. The second key in the self-destruct sequence initiated a century ago was the direct election of Senators. It has not improved the moral caliber of the Senate as promised , but removed the necessary power of individual states to ensure that their interests were accounted for in federal action. A side consequence was to remove an important buffer between the individual and the supreme government-making the individual a subject of remote and all powerful state. Nice critique and semantic fools guide to Orwellian wordspeak. He may have been a socialist but his deductive reasoning of a futuristic pessimistic political world was anything but a Hegelian or Marxist dialectical progression from a bifurcation of history to one that will endure perpetual conflict. Orwellian verisimilitudes perception or closer to the perception of political political theory and heuristics has some reflection from the Karl Popper empirical falsification of political history. This has become a prophetic truism of political realty and indeed the theory of communism has become falsified in actuality, instead, the processes for true communism was indeed a diffusion of Marxist economic theory which would correctly amount to a Popperist verisimilitude and an empirical falsification of classical Marxism in actuality. Orwell would have been saddened by this post. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. Never use a long word where a short one will do. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out. Never use the passive where you can use the active. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. Secondly, these are not big words for people who understand their meaning and conceptualise it in the context of the Orwellian thought thread. I was merely citing Karl Popper and not inputting intellectually elite concepts to impress the laity. The control comes more from within — and freely at that — than without. I take only one exception to your well written article. Our enemies clearly have faces, faces snarled with hatred toward freedom, women and Christ. Their faces are attached to bodies that brandish swords sword which they are far too eager to use in slashing your throat. What is truly Orwellian is that our own government intends for them to do just that. There are so many elements to the song that was ahead of its time, but waytoo long in some of its predictions. Parts of the song follow. But through eternal night, the twinkling of starlight. Pingback: Hello from me to you I agree withe the article, but I feel that Orwell can only address so much of what is awry in our current situation. I like the prison planet and mental control suggested by a Clockwork Orange. I think Orwell covers a lot of needed territory, but the situation is in fact much worse. Nice piece of propaganda in its own right. Along with the NSA, the big brother that is watching you is usually a corporation, such as Google. Nowdays, there are neither literature classes in any real sense of the word nor required reading lists. You cannot learn to think critically while sucking on the teat of big government and accepting the handouts it gives, both physical and mental. At first my husband thought that I was being a little dramatic, but not anymore. Why we enyoy spying on each other so much, for example via a relity tv. Crisis Magazine is a project of Sophia Institute Press. Sean Fitzpatrick is a graduate of Thomas Aquinas College and the Headmaster of Gregory the Great Academy. Homo-Homophobia The Iron-Fisted Tyranny of Political Correctness Our Universities Are Incorrigibly Religious A Lenten Meditation on an Unconventional Ash Wednesday. Go to Crisis homepage. It is here and we do nothing. I am fond of Crimes against nature and God. Actually, with the homosexual community in the US, the term homomafia is quite appropriate. I like your singular focus, but do you disagree with my larger points? The trend is that sex is important — so long as it is sterile. This is an unusually perceptive commentary on the state of our nation. Existence tax, TV tax, and all other ridiculous UK taxes. Can you two try to express yourselves without profanity? Moderator: how about removing posts with four-letter words. No, in the UK they are being killed off by the Liverpool Care Pathway …. Yeah, all is the horn of plenty with the British NHS. I would love the system that the UK has. You like starving to death in the hospital? Thank you for your comment. Enforcement of the Constitutional provision which requires Congress to declare war might have protected many young, innocent, and heroic men and women from untimely death. Orwell was also a socialist, interestingly. Detrimental reliance of spell-check should be a sin. Actually, not by the socialists but the communists. I wonder if you can stop answering everything with a hodgepodge of empty adages and loosely linked metaphors long enough to make a real argument in which you identify your perpetrators. I except your concession. Something about a pot and a kettle seems apropos. Incoherent thinking and projecting is a toxic brew. You guys should go to Prom! The control from within is aided from without. If woman can survive, they may find. From the bottom of a long glass tube. This is really interesting although i think its examples should include more than just things that happen in the US… This is happening all over the world and people need to become aware to the facts. Today the whole are of government consists in the art of being dishonest. I agree withe the article, but I feel that Orwell can only address so much of what is awry in our current situation. Liturgy of the Hours. Lady Day: A Counter-Protest Like No Other. Our Universities Are Incorrigibly Religious. Pro-Life Counseling Becomes Illegal in France. The Iron-Fisted Tyranny of Political Correctness.. Design by Perceptions Studio.
Easy Classification Essay Topics Antonyms How To Write A Play Name In An Essay About Sat Essay Question Sample
cahsee essay questions antonyms simple essay topics for kids online compare and contrast essay assignment about We've selected England's most qualified law tutors to help you ace exams.. Learn more about our TOK Outlines. The original file is a 'Word Docx ' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting. The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our TOK Outlines. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at. To what extent can knowledge progress over time and does the nature of knowledge influence its progression? For instance, across Areas of Knowledge AOKs like the natural sciences and the ethics knowledge may progress differently. This is partially because in each of these AOKs the definition of knowledge slightly differs. The quote by using the word "sometimes" takes into account different possibilities, yet implies that knowledge is not always discarded. To explore whether knowledge accepted today is discarded tomorrow it is important to specify what "knowledge" means in the context of specific AOKs. In the natural sciences "scientific knowledge" may be defined as information that has been found to be valid through empirical evidence and rational deduction and has not yet been disproven. The nature of knowledge may be described by its establishment: It is established through various ways of knowing WOK. First the scientist uses sense perception to observe his natural surroundings, then using creativity and imagination he could question how a specific natural phenomenon occurs. The natural scientist then aims to find an answer to the question through inductive and deductive logical reasoning, by setting up a hypothesis and finding supporting evidence. Other natural scientists may then come to know those findings through language and replicate them to strengthen prior knowledge or research may result in opposing evidence, potentially leading to the replacement of the old theory with a new one. Thus, the nature of the natural sciences influences its progression. Knowledge in the natural sciences aims to discover permanently valid objective laws of nature. Yet, can a theory be permanently valid? For instance humankind has learned long ago how to make fire and this knowledge has remained permanently valid. However, we have used this knowledge to develop new inventions like fuel, factories, or the Bunsen burner that we use in biology class. Thus, the natural sciences aim to make valid discoveries but since research is ongoing knowledge in the natural sciences changes over time instead of being "discarded". It is the provisional nature of scientific knowledge that sets up the basis for the way that it progresses: previous knowledge is questioned and shaped, rather than "discarded", to form new scientific knowledge. The latest findings of natural sciences are then regarded as scientific knowledge accepted today while the older findings are one step in the process of acquiring this knowledge. In such cases, knowledge may still be accepted as being valid, yet is perceived as limited since more extensive knowledge has been built upon it. However, this is assuming that scientists knew about the previous scientists' work. It may have been unlikely such knowledge existed when we consider scientific research in a time before communication between scientists around the world was possible. Oftentimes the buildup of knowledge is possible by enhancing WOK, as with the stethoscope that enhances auditory sense perception. From the above it can be seen that in the natural sciences knowledge accepted "today" is modified rather than discarded - even if a previous scientist found knowledge that could be falsified, it may have led later scientists closer towards a valid model. In contrast, it could be claimed that a paradigm shift, where a former valid theory was totally abandoned and replaced by a different theory, shows that knowledge in the natural sciences can be discarded. An example of an old theory being replaced by another, since contrary evidence was found, can be taken from my IB biology class where we learn about Mendel's law of independent assortment that widely changed the understanding of genetics. He proposed that alleles of genes located on different chromosomes assort independently from one another, creating genetic variety. Before Mendel, people often believed that the characteristics of parents were equally blended in the offspring. However, the paradigm shift may require some time to be accepted by the general public, as this depends on factors like perspectives, culture and beliefs of people, as well as pre-existing assumptions that had Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our TOK Outlines. Oxbridge Notes is a trading name operated by Jack Kinsella. By using our website you agree to our privacy policy and terms. Hire a Law Tutor. Hire a law tutor. Or become a tutor. However, the paradigm shift may require some time to be accepted by the general public, as this depends on factors like perspectives, culture and beliefs of people, as well as pre-existing assumptions that had.. Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our TOK Outlines. United Kingdom Notes United States Notes Australia Notes Canada Notes New Zealand Notes Ireland Notes. By using our website you agree to our privacy policy and terms..
Style Analysis Essay Online Descriptive Essay Thesis Statement Definition Legalizing Prostitution Essay About
into thin air essay synonyms technology essays university auto paraphrase tool how to write
