What troubles me is that I think the touchscreen Metro interface is an appalling business decision. The article focuses on dev concerns (whether perceived or actual), but something that hasn't been asked is "Do consumers want a touchscreen driven desktop?" This could cause serious issues for the desktop PC market if MS have gauged this badly. How many average Joes want a mobile interface with there desktop? Far as I'm aware, the average PC buyer wants to surf the web, watch things and write Word documents. Anything that makes any of that harder will have a knock-on effect where the user may end up junking their shiny Win8 PC for a Mac, simply because it's not worth the effort. And that ends up affecting the total PC userbase.
When I edit photos from a shoot the first task is to go through between 1,000 and 1,500 shots in RAW format. I do that at full screen resolution so that I can get as good a feel for the shot as possible. Frequently there are as many as 10 or so shots that are all very similar, and I want to flip between them pretty quickly to compare and choose which one I think is the keeper from the group. I also had struggles with the sliders where I would move one a little and have to wait for a second or two before it would be reflected on the screen, leading to me overdoing the change in the slider – back and forth. Ugh. Configuration tweaks helped. Closing down all of the other software too. But, for me, until I brought the hardware up to the levels recommended in the article, I wasn't happy with my experience editing photos.
The only disadvantage of setting up the new mail profile is that Outlook will start from "scratch" the process of downloading the Mailbox content to the local desktop. When dealing with a Large Mailbox, this process could take some time. So if a student lives with a non-student, the student is disregarded. This means the council tax could be reduced as if only a single person lives there, leading to a potential 25% reduction. purchase windows software
|
